Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Cogging : A Missing Term in A.I. - Redefining Understanding in Large Language Models

Wolstencroft, Martin
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Large Language Models (LLMs) have dramatically increased the capabilities of AI solutions by being able to generate human-like text in response to prompts. However, a misconception has arisen that these models "think" or "understand”. This misconception is perpetuated by continued inappropriate use of the words ‘think’ and ‘understand’. This paper addresses this misconception and inappropriate use by introducing the terms "cog" and "cogging" as replacements when referring to the operations of LLMs. The proposed terminology aims to clarify that LLMs generate statistically coherent responses without possessing consciousness, intentionality, or true understanding. Adopting "cog" and "cogging," provides a more accurate framework for discussing the capabilities and limitations of LLMs, ultimately contributing to a clearer understanding of artificial intelligence in both academic and public discourse.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 85180
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive