PhilArchive
open access
What Holds Groups Together? How Interdependence Shapes Group Living
Dunbar’s emphasis on dyadic relationships in group formation overlooks the roles of interdependence and joint commitment in social cohesion. We challenge his premise by highlighting the importance of group-level processes, particularly where top-down group pressures like cooperative breeding and out-group threat can induce joint commitment as an alternate means to sustain group cohesion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Wild chimpanzee groups increase social connectivity prior to risky collective action#369692
- Thermidor's Ratchet: The Generative Paradox, Formalized - Why the Movement That Wins the Vacuum Governs Harder Than the Regime It Replaced#695780
- Collective contributions to polarized voting#984060
- Collective Responsibility for Oppression#770009
- The Problem of the Attractor A Singular Generality between Sciences and Social Theory.#315246
Record · ID 85255
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive