ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Effect of Using Two Different Prosthetic Feet in Patients With Unilateral Transtibial Amputation
Background: Prescribing optimal prosthetic feet to ensure successful rehabilitation is difficult since there are no generally established clinical guidelines based on objective data. Aim: To investigate the effect of using non-articulated dynamic foot (non-articulating ankle, NAA) and dynamic foot with hydraulic ankle (articulating hydraulic ankle, AHA) on functional capacity, pain severity, satisfaction level and quality of life (QoL) in high activity patients with unilateral transtibial amputation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Evaluation of the Access Socket Flexible Socket for Transtibial Prosthesis#878995
- Asymmetry of the Center of Pressure During Gait After Amputation of Lower Limbs#904131
- Interventional Study on the Evaluation of Functionality, Safety of a Robotic Prosthesis for Transtibial Amputations#848262
- Effects of Pin and Vacuum Assisted Suspension Systems#1171467
- Improving Socket Fit in Female and Male Veterans With Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputation#1033361
Record · ID 853965
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive