ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison of Orally Pilocarpine and Artificial Saliva in Xerostomy Treatment
The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the safetyness and efficacy of pilocarpine drops versus artificial saliva as symptomatic treatment for dry mouth and dry eyes caused by SS in a multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A New Oral salIvary equivAlent Compared to Two moisturizinG Mouth sprAys in Patients With xeRostomiA: NIAGARA Study#841778
- Creation and Characterization of Two Groups of Subjects to Evaluate Sensitivity#882658
- Blinded Dry Mouth Spray Crossover Study#897985
- Effect of Xylitol-Containing Chewing Gum With/Without Bicarbonate Versus Paraffin Pellet on Salivary pH#1008835
- Application of Neuro-electrostimulation as a Treatment for Patients With Dry Mouth#862022
Record · ID 854114
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive