ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Computer-aided Indirect Bonding Versus Traditional Direct Bonding of Brackets in Orthodontic Patients
Accurate bracket positioning is one of the keys for effective orthodontic treatment. Traditionally, orthodontic brackets are positioned one-by-one on the teeth of the patient, with the so-called direct bonding method. In the past, the term indirect bonding defined a technique where the brackets were positioned on a plaster model in order to increase placement precision. A transfer tray was then built on the plaster, incorporating all the brackets mounted. Finally, this transfer tray was positioned in the mouth of the patient, so that all the brackets could be bonded to the teeth at once in the pre-determined position. Several studies have investigated this indirect technique based on plaster models. With computer-aided technology, a new form of digital indirect bonding is now possible. The dentist digitally places the brackets on a virtual 3D model of the teeth. A tray with the brackets' positioning information is then generated with CAD-CAM (computer aided design and manufacturing) technology and the brackets are subsequently indirectly transferred to the teeth. This new approach could possibly save chair time and increase precision. Our profession is today moving towards the virtual reality, and application of such a computer-aided technology method into the clinical work-flow seems definitely promising for our future daily practice. Since the evidence about this new computer-assisted indirect bracket bonding method is very limited, the purpose of this study is to evaluate precision, chair time, and bracket survival by comparing this digital indirect bonding method to the traditional direct bonding method Specific objectives * To assess and compare the accuracy of a conventional direct bonding method with an indirect computer-aided bonding method. * To evaluate chair time and bracket survival related to both bonding methods. Hypothesis Null hypothesis: I. There is no difference in accuracy of bracket placement between the direct and indirect bonding method
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Digital vs Conventional VFR in Post-Orthodontic Retention#860884
- Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding Versus Digitally-Assisted Indirect Bonding in Orthodontic Patients#906875
- Application of Virtual Mandibular Position in Temporomandibular Jont Reconstruction With Costochondral Graft in Children Jaw Deformity#992267
- Development of Biofunctional 3D-Printed Orthodontic Aligners With Antimicrobial and Remineralizing Properties#834375
- 3D Facial Scanning in Full-Arch Implant Prosthodontics: Time Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction#967320
Record · ID 854266
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive