ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Gastric Insufflation Volume Using I-gel Versus Ambu AuraGain in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Orthopedic Operations Under General Anesthesia
Our study aimed to compare the gastric insufflation volume between Ambu AuraGain and i-gel and its relationship with the oropharyngeal sealing pressure and the incidence of postoperative complications in generally anesthetized controlled-ventilated pediatric patients undergoing elective orthopedic operations.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cricoid Pressure Versus Paratracheal Pressure#843748
- Risks of Gastroesophageal Reflux in the Endotracheal Intubation or the I-gel#910654
- Effect of Bispectral Index Monitoring (BIS) on Body Movement of Outpatients Undergoing Gastroscopy#853638
- Additional Benefit of Thoracic Impedance Monitoring (TIM) for Propofol-sedation Monitoring During PEG Placement#810208
- CO2 Insufflation During Single-Balloon-Enteroscopy#1073568
Record · ID 855162
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive