ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Saphenous Vein Harvesting by Endoscopic Versus Open Conventional Methods
The aim of this study is to investigate the histological and immunohistochemical findings of the saphenous vein graft, to rule out endothelial damage as a direct result of manipulation or instrumentation by endoscopic and open conventional harvesting methods. Furthermore, to investigate if there are any differences in the surgical site infection, cardiac event and functional status between the two harvest strategies at 1-year of follow-up.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein at the Ankle in Infants#1085692
- Percutaneous Anastomosis Creation for Hemodialysis Access#829732
- EUS-FNA With 22G Procore Needles vs 22G Conventional Needles#865788
- Germany – Endoscopy, endosurgery devices – Endo-Urologischer Arbeitsplatz (Managed Service) — Hochtaunus Kliniken gGmbH (DEU) · 608447.09 EUR#605855
- Bronchoscopic Versus Airway Exchange Catheter-Guided Endotracheal Tube Exchange#833174
Record · ID 855188
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive