Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Suturing Profienciency for OBGYN Residents

A recent survey of obstetrics and gynecology fellowship program directors showed that graduating OB/GYN residents may be underprepared for advanced laparoscopic training, necessitating an evaluation of the current structure of resident and fellow curriculum. Specifically, only 46% of first year fellows were able to independently perform an abdominal hysterectomy. Out of 28 residents tested using a previously validated laparoscopic cuff suturing model, only 8 (28.6%) passed the assessment. For this reason, it is necessary to identify the most effective and efficient educational approaches to obtain procedural proficiency. Time and effort has been placed in developing simulation programs. Simulation has shown promising outcomes in improving the performance of trainees and attending physicians with the ultimate objective of generating better surgeons. A previous meta-analysis of simulation-based educational assessments demonstrated that these assessments correlate positively with patient-related outcomes. However, there are limited studies with adequate validity to use simulation for summative evaluations of performance for gynecology residents. The widely used Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program is used for credentialing of general surgeons, however, a systematic review suggested that more validity evidence is required to support its content (selection of tasks and scoring rubric) and the consequences (favorable and unfavorable impact) assessment. Although there has been an increase in the number of models available to teach OB/GYN common gynecologic procedures, there is a lack of evidence to support that these methods are actually allowing residents to create better surgical skills. To address the current limitations in OB/GYN training, the investigators have developed short, guided drills that cover the steps required for laparoscopic suturing and allow residents opportunities for deliberate practice. These drills will be tested compared to resident