ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Supine vs. Prone PCNL for Large Renal Stones: A Randomized Trial in Yemen.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient recovery of two different surgical positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in adults aged 18 to 70 years who have kidney stones larger than 2 cm. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the supine (lying on the back) surgical position result in fewer early postoperative complications than the traditional prone (lying on the stomach) position? * Does the supine position reduce the total surgery time, direct hospital costs, and postoperative pain? Researchers will compare patients assigned to undergo PCNL in the supine position to those assigned to the prone position to see if the supine approach offers a safer, more cost-effective, and more comfortable recovery. Participants will: * Undergo standard PCNL surgery to remove their kidney stones in either the supine or prone position. * Have their pain levels, surgery time, and any early surgical complications monitored during their hospital stay. * Complete brief questionnaires regarding their overall surgical satisfaction and quality of life at 1 month and 3 months after the procedure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy#1094873
- Comparison of ESWL and Mini-PCNL for High-Density Renal Stones in Children#841361
- Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones#840860
- Effectiveness of US-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment#806214
- Standard Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones#901809
Record · ID 857035
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive