ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Postoperative Recovery Between TIVA and Inhalation Agent
This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study is designed to compare the postoperative quality of recovery between propofol based total intravenous anesthesia and desflurane in patients undergoing minimally invasive nephrectomy. We hypothesize that propofol based total intravenous anesthesia can significantly improve the quality of recovery after surgery in patients with minimally invasive nephrectomy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Remimazolam vs. Propofol: Impact on Postoperative Delirium in Neurosurgical Patients#886846
- Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Under Selective, General Anesthesia.#891764
- Trajectories of Recovery After Intravenous Propofol Versus Inhaled VolatilE Anesthesia Trial#916445
- Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones#1161398
- Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Pringle Method Combined With IVC Flow Limiting and Blocking Method in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Based on Non-restrictive Fluid Therapy Strategy#831648
Record · ID 857304
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive