ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
This prospective randomized surgical trial is designed to compare objective and subjective outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lateral suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.#828408
- Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative urinary retention following pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a retrospective study.#354577
- GYNECARE PROSIMA* Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Uterine Prolapse Stage III#1127176
- LAparoscopic Preventive PRErectal Mesh#856364
- Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment#890817
Record · ID 860328
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive