ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pipelle vs the Curved Aspirator Device
The primary aim of this study is to rigorously compare the efficacy of two commonly used endometrial sampling devices, the Pipelle and the Miltex, these devices are standard of care at Maimonides. This primary objective is critical, as the ability to accurately reach the uterine cavity is fundamental to obtaining adequate samples for histopathological evaluation, which is crucial for diagnosing endometrial cancer and other uterine pathologies.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Study of Circular Stapling Instruments#916968
- Feeding Tube Attachment Device Versus Conventional Fixation and Its Impact on Accidental Exit of Enteral Feeding Tubes#862566
- Developing Rectal USPE Measures#969160
- Safety and Efficiency of Electrocautery-enhanced Lumen-apposing Stents - a Single Center Experience#916024
- Assessment of a Multiplex PCR for the Simultaneous Diagnosis of Intestinal Cryptosporidiosis and Microsporidiosis#231753
Record · ID 860363
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive