ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Temporary External Fixation and Open Reduction With Internal Fixation for the Management of Pilon Fracture: A Prospective Clinical Trial.
Pilon fractures are among the difficult injuries to treat in orthopedic surgery. Treatment approaches should consider associated soft tissue injuries. The two main treatment modalities are a two-stage procedure (secondary open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and primary external fixation) and one-stage ORIF. The latter is widely agreed upon in the literature. In the present study, we contrasted the outcomes of these two approaches.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Open Reduction in Femoral Neck Fractures#838877
- PENURUNAN SKALA NYERI PADA PASIEN POST OPEN REDUCTIONAL INTERNAL FIXATION MENGGUNAKAN RELAKSASI NAFAS DALAM DAN TERAPI MUSIK#1003148
- The Use of a Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation Device for Treatment of Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures#1153752
- Ilizarov Frame or Uni Planar External Fixator in the Cost-conscious Era#979778
- Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures: A Protocol for a Study of Two Plate Options#838428
Record · ID 860476
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive