ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Prolonged Sedation in Critically Ill Trauma and Surgical Patients
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for prolonged sedation in trauma and surgical patients.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early Goal-Directed Sedation Compared With Standard Care in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients#1127552
- Propofol Versus Ketamine for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Ill Patients#1138615
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Prolonged Sedation in Poly Traumatized Mechanically Ventilated Patients#1172255
- A Comparison of Propofol Versus Midazolam to Sedate Critically Brain Injury; Measurement of Cytokine Response and Assessment of Function#830493
- A Comparison Between Propofol-Remifentanil and Midazolam-Remifentanil Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit#827623
Record · ID 861254
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive