ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Barbed Versus PGA Sutures in Minimally Invasive Dismembered Pyeloplasty
The main goals of this trial is to study the feasibility and safety of using barbed sutures compared to the conventional PGA (Polyglactin) sutures in minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty. The main questions in using barbed sutures would be: 1. Is it safe with similar post-operative outcomes? 2. Does it have any significant complications? 3. Is it easier to handle intra-operatively?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Use of Avaulta for Anterior Repair#916983
- A Comparative Study of Scar Quality and Safety According to Suture Materials Following Excision of Benign Tumors#852539
- Avaulta Versus Anterior Repair#874162
- Safety and Efficacy of realSKIN® to Provide Complete Wound Closure of Burn Wounds as an Alternative to Autografting#800976
- Cohera TissuGlu® Surgical Adhesive in the Management of Wound Drainage#1008718
Record · ID 861279
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive