ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Assisted Visual Impairment Screening Model: Community-based Implementation and Evaluation of Performance, Feasibility and Costs.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the performance, operational efficiency, acceptability, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of an AI-assisted screening model for visual impairment in a community setting. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can the AI-assisted screening model improve screening and referral accuracy compared to the current traditional screening approach? * Does the AI-assisted model enhance operational efficiency and reduce healthcare costs in a community setting? Researchers will compare the AI-assisted model with the current traditional screening approach to assess its impact on screening accuracy, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Participants will: * Undergo vision screening using either the AI-assisted model or the traditional model. * Provide feedback on the acceptability of the screening approach. * Contribute to evaluating the feasibility and costs associated with each screening method.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mild Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis and Care Algorithms and the Role of Digital Interventions: Expert Consensus.#645188
- Potential of Interface Care Models to Deliver More Appropriate Care to Patients With Acute Medical Illness#852218
- From Knowledge to Legitimacy: A Philosophical Problem Discovery of AI Implementation Readiness in Public Health Disease Surveillance#1144480
- A Big Data-based Cohort Study for Cataract Patients#806705
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CMR Scanning vs Standard-of-Care: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Benefits From 6,545 Consecutive Studies.#148249
Record · ID 861409
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive