ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Physician- vs Questionnaire-Based Screening for Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis
Early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) requires close collaboration between dermatologists (as the skin manifestations of psoriatic disease in most cases precede the musculoskeletal manifestations) and rheumatologists (who are usually responsible for the final diagnosis of PsA and treatment of the musculoskeletal manifestations). Previous epidemiological studies suggest that there may still be a significant proportion of undiagnosed PsA patients among those with psoriasis seen by a dermatologist. At the same time, a diagnostic delay of more than 6 months contributes to poor radiological and functional outcomes in PsA patients. Several screening tools / questionnaires (including the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Evaluation - PASE, the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen - ToPAS and its further development - TOPAS 2, the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool - PEST, and the Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire - EARP) have been developed and validated in the past decades - all relying mostly on symptoms reported by a patient with psoriasis without an evaluation / confirmation of the presence of musculoskeletal symptoms by a dermatologist. The CONTEST study, which compared three screening tools (PASE, ToPAS and PEST) in a secondary care setting, determined that they all had a good probability of detecting PsA (sensitivity of approximately 80%) but had poor specificity (approximately 35%). Further analysis of the results of the above study has identified the most discriminative questions from each of the three questionnaires, including questions about the back and neck, and these items have been combined to create a new single 8-item screening questionnaire (CONTEST). However, a subsequent study demonstrated a similar performance for the CONTEST and the PEST tools. This poor specificity means that screening questionnaires are often not used in practice and raises a risk of overwhelming rheumatology referrals. In a recent survey of GRAPPA members, most
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Development of a predictive marker panel for the individualised bDMARD therapy of psoriatic arthritis: protocol for a prospective observational study (Integrate-PsA).#375351
- Psoriatic arthritis digital phenotyping and inflammation drivers (PDPID) study: protocol for an international multicentre prospective cohort.#1167012
- Entheseal tissue signature in response to IL-17A inhibition in psoriatic arthritis: results from the EBIO entheseal biopsy study / Maria Gabriella Raimondo, Hashem Mohammadian, Simon Rauber, STEFANO ALIVERNINI, Vladyslav Fedorchenko, Aleix Rius Rigau, Mario Raphael Angeli, Filippo Fagni, Giulia Corte, Koray TASCILAR, Hannah Labinsky, Alina M. Ramming, Frank Roemer, Juergen Rech, Lars Braeuer, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Georg Schett, Milena Pachowsky, Arnd Kleyer, Andreas Ramming#1078557
- Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Nicotinamide Riboside on Immune Activation in Psoriasis#800198
- microRNA in Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis#1030358
Record · ID 862201
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive