ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Induction of Labor in Women With Unfavorable Cervix: Dilapan Versus Foley Bulb
Women undergoing mechanical cervical ripening for labor induction will be randomized to Dilapan-S® versus Foley bulb. The investigators hypothesized that osmotic cervical dilators (Dilapan-S®) are as effective as Foley bulb catheter in rates of vaginal delivery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Inpatient Versus Outpatient Cervical Ripening#966340
- Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home#1173173
- Cervical Preparation for Same-Day Dilation & Evacuation#831255
- A Randomized, Control Trial for Preinduction Cervical Ripening#905086
- MISOBEST - Orally Misoprostol Solution (Cytotec®) Versus Orally Misoprostol as a Tablet (Angusta®) for Induction of Labor#1087938
Record · ID 865358
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive