ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Sacral Fractures
The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate patients with vertically unstable high-energy sacral fracture operated on at our institution with spinopelvic fixation, to compare the traditionally open method of fixation with the minimally invasive fixation. The aim of the research is to determine whether minimally invasive surgical techniques can achieve comparable fracture reduction and functional outcome as open surgical approaches. Another aim is to determine whether the minimally invasive surgical procedure leads to shorter patient hospitalization, lower perioperative blood loss, and lower postoperative complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Geriatric Distal Femur#911119
- Lumbopelvic Fixation Versus Novel Adjustable Plate for Displaced Sacral Fracture#991983
- Assiut University Heart Hospital#970014
- The Use of a Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation Device for Treatment of Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures#1153752
- Feasibility of Integrating Local Vibration Into Rehabilitation of Elderly Patients After Hip Fracture#862198
Record · ID 865707
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive