ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Static Implant Versus Dynamic Implant in the Surgical Treatment on Ankle Syndesmosis Rupture
Ankle fracture is frequent and its number is increasing. In Canada, surgical treatment of these lesions is advised and the options currently used all have in common a rigid fixation of the syndesmosis which results in residual stiffness and a high level of secondary surgery, mostly to remove the implant. The purpose of the study is to compare the treatment of ankle syndesmotic rupture by a dynamic fixation to a static fixation suggesting that the dynamic fixation method will improve the Olerud-Molander functional score of more than 15 points at the 3 months follow-up.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early Weight Bearing for Ankle Fractures#859289
- Syndesmosis Ankle Study#904667
- Two-layer Suturing of Achilles Tendon Ruptures#904815
- Performance after surgical treatment of patients with ankle fractures--14-month follow-up.#644873
- Follow up of Patients After a Visit to Tourcoing Emergency Department for an Ankle Sprain#878674
Record · ID 865871
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive