ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
ShockPulse-SE vs. Trilogy Trial: Comparing the Performance of Two Intracorporeal Lithotripters for Removal of Large Renal Calculi
The purpose of this study is to measure how well two different devices work to break up and remove kidney stones. We are comparing a newer device to an older one to see which one is faster at breaking up kidney stones. We hypothesize that the Trilogy will increase the stone clearance rate by 25% compared to the Shockpulse-SE
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early vs Delayed Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Residual Stones After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy#805113
- Evaluation of Different Treatment Modalities for Lower Pole and Renal Pelvis Stones#982599
- SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial#903364
- Effect of Double J Stent on Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy#1033110
- Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Under Selective, General Anesthesia.#891764
Record · ID 866060
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive