ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Systemic Lidocaine Versus Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
The investigators are evaluating the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty that receive either systemic lidocaine or ultrasound-guided adductor canal block as part of their anesthetic plan.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block and Surgeon-Performed Block for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty#860784
- Enhanced Recovery After Major Surgery and Chronic Pain for Total Knee Arthroplasty#1101732
- Ultrasound-guided Continuous Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Replacement: Comparison of Short-axis and Long-axis Techniques#993807
- A Novel Single-puncture Triple Nerve Block; Sciatic, Obturator, Femoral Technique (SOFT), as a Sole Anesthesia for Knee Surgeries#802928
- Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block and Combined Adductor Canal Block Plus IPACK Block in Knee Surgery#801255
Record · ID 866074
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive