ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate during repair of linear cutaneous surgery wounds improves scar cosmesis compared to wound closure with 5-0 fast absorbing gut.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section#915137
- Exciflex for Chronic Wound Therapy#366551
- The Role of 2-octyl Cyanoacrylate in Prevention of Recurrent Adhesions After Circumcision#853951
- Ultrasonic Wound Debridement vs. Standard Sharp Debridement#864430
- Derivo 2 Heal vs Derivo 2: In-Stent Stenosis After Flow Diversion#863473
Record · ID 866517
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive