ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Feasibility Trial of the Womb Watch Smartphone App To Assess Fetal Movements
The surveillance of pregnancies at risk for fetal loss secondary to high-risk maternal or fetal conditions remains a mainstay of perinatal care. Current testing to prevent fetal loss includes the regular use of ultrasound (biophysical profile) or fetal heart rate monitoring (non-stress test) in an outpatient clinic setting once or twice weekly. A patient may also be asked to subjectively assess daily fetal movements during the time between routine antepartum testing appointments. However, there are no good systems for pregnant women to objectively measure fetal movements. Smartphones have allowed for the development of applications that utilize various embedded devices including the camera and microphone. In our recent pilot STUDY00001552 of 205 pregnant patients, placement of the iPhone10 microphone directly on the maternal abdominal wall was utilized to detect fetal movements. AI assessment of the audio recordings proved superior to maternal perception of fetal movements that were recorded during simultaneous ultrasound (gross fetal movements: 64% audio vs 18% maternal; breathing: 93% vs 3%, hiccups: 73% vs 3%). This trial is a prospective, observational, feasibility study of 60 patients that includes both low-risk and high-risk pregnant women to examine the usability of the Womb Watch smartphone application. The study will involve introduction of the Womb Watch app to a population of pregnant patients. Features of the app will be modified based on participant feedback. Anxiety levels of the patient will be tracked serially using a survey tool. The various types and versions of smartphones will be assessed to see if they affect the AI model. Finally, patients will be asked to determine the strength of fetal movements to see if this parameter can be assessed by the AI model. Amniotic fluid data will assessed through clinical ultrasounds to see if this also has any effect on the AI model's ability to detect fetal movements.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study of Mayo Clinic CV Research Heart & Voice Study#878884
- From virtual pregnancy to digital twin obstetrics: multimodal data integration for personalized prediction of pregnancy complications.#338429
- Accuracy of the Apple Watch Series 4 for Detection of Heart Rhythm: A Pilot Study#968215
- The Role of Background Activity Monitoring by Amplitude-Integrated EEG to Predict Short-Term Neurological Outcome in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: Insights from a Real-Life Retrospective Cohort.#140511
- Individual differences in heartbeat-tone synchronicity judgments suggest the two-alternative heartbeat detection task is a poor test of cardiac interoceptive accuracy and insight#232842
Record · ID 866633
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive