ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Visual Performance of Clareon PanOptix vs. a Comparable Multifocal Intraocular Lens
This is a two-part, multi-center, investigator-initiated clinical study comparing visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in subjects receiving bilateral implantation of either the Clareon PanOptix intraocular lens (IOL) or a comparable multifocal IOL. The study includes a retrospective/prospective pilot phase and a prospective, randomized comparison phase.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Long-term Comparative Analysis of Visual Outcomes With 3 Intraocular Lenses: Monofocal, Trifocal and Accommodating#825977
- Clinical Investigation of the Visual Outcomes and Safety of a Trifocal Toric IOL in an Asian Population#852940
- Comparative Study of 2 Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Heidelberg#1162586
- Patient Satisfaction and Visual Outcomes After Bilateral PanOptix Implantation in Patients With Previous Multifocal Contact Lens#857053
- Clinical Investigation of AcrySof® IQ PanOptix™ IOL Model TFNT00#969852
Record · ID 866711
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive