ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Crossover Study Evaluating 3 Non-medicated Silicone IVRs
The overall aim of this study is to assess different external diameters of intravaginal rings (IVRs) for adherence, preference, and acceptability. To assess these domains, women in male-partnered relationships will use three different size IVRs.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Developing Rectal USPE Measures#969160
- Capturing quality of life in pouch anal and vaginal fistula: development of PAVF-QoL-14, a patient-reported outcome measure.#659494
- Treatment of Dysmenorrhoea With the OVA TENS Apparatus#860092
- Female Sexual Function After Surgery for Benign Perianal Diseases#982567
- Assessment of Sexual Function in Male Patients Undergoing Hydrocelectomy and Their Partners#829174
Record · ID 866865
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive