ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Accuracy of Pulse Oximeters During Profound Hypoxia
This study is designed to calibrate and determine the accuracy for SpO2, pulse rate and respiratory rate of the newly in-house build Test Device wrist 1 (TDw1, or EVA) at Philips. SpO2, pulse rate and respiratory rate during hypoxia will be calculated by using data of well-known reference devices, including: * A reference SpO2 sensor of Nellcor placed at a fingertip, that reflects also continuously the pulse rate Will be used to compare with the test device. * A reference respiratory rate device that calculates the respiratory rate based on detection of end-tidal CO2 peaks by capnography. * Oxygen saturation in arterial blood samples (SaO2), determined by a co-oximeter will be used to calculate the accuracy of the test device. During the study the following devices will be additionally used by the volunteers: * AppleWatch 7 * TDw2, watch build by philips, using the PPG and software technology developed by Philips * A smartphone that detects reflected PPG signals from the reflected screen at the handpalm, by the build in frontfacing camera (TDc) of the smartphone Volunteers will undergo progressive hypoxia (9 min/% O2) from 21 to 10% O2 in an altitude room, resulting in a volunteer's SpO2 of 73%. During this deliberated hypoxia, the volunteers wear the test and reference devices. This study consists of 4 sub-studies (NI = non-invasive; IN = invasive with an arterial line): * NI (Fast-Sitting): volunteers are seated in the hypoxia room in which the ambient oxygen concentration decreases at a speed of 9 min/% O2. If the volunteer reached a SpO2 ≤73% for more than 1 minute, he/she leaves the hypoxia room. And will breath air with 21% oxygen. Volunteers wear TDw1 and TDw2 and the reference devices. * NI(Fast-Lying): identical to NI(Fast-Sitting) but volunteers lay on a mattress. Volunteers wear TDw1 and AppleWatch 7 and the reference devices. * NI (Slow-Sitting): identical to NI (Fast-Sitting), but after one of the volunteers reaches a SpO2 ≤73% for more than one
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In Vivo Pulse Oximeter Validation Study#1137159
- Verification of Pulse Oximetry in Neonatal Population#839360
- OxyGap : Comparison Between Different Pulse Oximeter and With the Arterial Blood Gase#838947
- Fingertip Pulse Oximeter Clinical Test#802433
- SpO2 Accuracy In Vivo Testing for Neonates & Infants#915332
Record · ID 867174
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive