ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison of Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Compare the effectiveness and safety of contact aspiration (CA) and stent retriever (SR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Stent Retriever Versus Contact Aspiration in Irregular Occlusion Phenotype#1101142
- Combined Use of Contact Aspiration and the Stent Retriever Technique Versus Stent Retriever Alone for Recanalisation in Acute Cerebral Infarction#901591
- Trial to Assess the Safety of Vorapaxar in Japanese Subjects With Cerebral Infarction (P05005; MK-5348-017)#1126020
- The Vesalio NeVa Stent Retriever Registry Study for Treatment of Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes#890830
- Benefits of First Pass Recanalization by Initial Infarct Burden for Basilar Artery Strokes#129475
Record · ID 867364
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive