ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of an Ultra-low Strut Thickness Everolimus-eluting Biodegradable Polymer Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-eluting Stents in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
The objective of this randomized study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the ultra-low strut thickness everolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer Evermine50 stent to the everolimus-eluting family stents (durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience or Promus stents) in a population-based setting with coronary artery stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Sten for Coronary Lesions in Acute Myocardial Infarction#886671
- To Evaluate the Performance and Safety of RisoR Crest Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System#855413
- A Prospective, Multi-center Trial to Assess an Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System (PROMUS Element™)#910253
- NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-eluting Stent Trial#800315
- Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III (LONG-DES-III)#906168
Record · ID 867696
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive