ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of Emergency Suturing With Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Suture Material in a Pediatric Population
The investigators recruit patients admitted to the Pediatric Emergency Department of the Geneva's University Hospital with open wounds needing suture. The patients are treated with absorbable versus non-absorbable suture material according to randomization. Outcomes are: 1. infection rate at the first follow-up (between 4 and 14 days, depending on the sutured site and defined by protocol) 2. scar appearance at a 6-months follow-up.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures#875343
- Comparison of microMend® Devices to Sutures in Closing Lacerations in Children#904737
- Comparative Analysis of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Section#812405
- Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy#810721
- Tissue Reinforcement of Incisional Closure Among High Risk Patients#1137519
Record · ID 868229
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive