PhilArchive
open access
A Theory of Institutional Objects
The author criticizes the characterization of institutional objects (proposed independently by John Searle and Ota Weinberger) according to which institutional objects are necessarily objects cum fundamento in re, that is, objects that presuppose a material substrate on which they are based.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Charities, Endowments, and Donor Intent: The Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act#181422
- Institutiones#496159
- The Coherence Framework: Explaining Institutional Drift through Translation#731710
- Culture and Institutions#10627
- From Negentropy to Norms - A Gain-Based Theory of Agency: Kerdotism.#151357
Record · ID 86828
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive