ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effectiveness of Two Maxillary Expanders in Improving the Transverse Skeletal and Dental Dimensions in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
This randomized controlled trial is designed to compare between quadlelix appliance vs hyrax expander regrading the their effectiveness in maxillary expansion in patients with cleft.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dento-skeletal Effects of Quadhelix Versus Mini-hyrax Expanders in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate at the Mixed Dentition Stage: A Randomized Clinical Trial#1173468
- Comparison of Two Tooth-borne Expanders in Rapid Maxillary Expansion#836257
- Clear Orthodontic Expander Versus Hyrax#879358
- Dentoskeletal Effects of the Expander With Differential Opening and the Fan-type Expander#1032829
- Digital vs. Analog Inputs in CAD/CAM Orthodontics: A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Palatal Expander Fabrication Workflow#968106
Record · ID 868899
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive