ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) & Ferric Sulfate (FS) Pulpotomies
Comparison of clinical and radiographic success between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Ferric Sulfate pulpotomies for primary molars. Recall appointments are completed 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pulpotomy Materials in Primary Molars#806818
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid (Gengigel Teething) Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate( Angelus) as Pulpotomy Agent in Vital Primary Molars#884470
- The Effect of MTA and PRF Application in Periapical Lesions#969463
- Assessment of I-PRF Versus Nano MTA Combined with I-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Therapy in Mature Mandibular First Molars#877597
- Assessment of the Number of Missing Tooth Surfaces and the Molecular Findings on the Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy Using Two Calcium Silicate Materials#1044718
Record · ID 869310
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive