ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of EUS-Guided 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Versus Fine-needle Aspiration for Suspected Pancreatic Neoplasms
We aim to compare the efficacy (diagnostic yield), ease of use, and technical success rates of EUS guided 22 gauge fine needle aspiration to core biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic tumors. The experimental hypothesis is that FNA will have superior overall diagnostic yield than core biopsy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Macroscopic on Site Evaluation (MOLSE) vs Standard Specimen Acquisition of Solid Lesions During EUS-FNB#856577
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With 25-gauge Biopsy Needles for Solid Pancreatic Masses#853053
- Prospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Efficacy of a EUS Guided FNB Needle (AQUIRE®)#901412
- Repeated EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Masses After Non-diagnostic or Inconclusive Results#896047
- On-site Cytopathology EUS-FNA#859596
Record · ID 869350
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive