ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnosis of Endobronchial US-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
The aim of this study is to compare dexmedetomidine as moderate sedation versus general anathesia on the diagnostic yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy-Assisted Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration#918175
- Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation for Endobronchial Ultrasound#451544
- Oral Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric MRI#800871
- Nasal Versus Buccal Oxygen Administration for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration#882102
- Dexmedetomidine Use for Sedation in Patients Submitted to Tracheal Surgery#1060225
Record · ID 869970
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive