ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single Versus Multiple Fractionated SSRS for Spinal Metastases
The investigators proposed this randomized study to determine the feasibility of delivering single-fraction 16-Gy versus 3-fraction 24-Gy toward spine metastatic lesion and to evaluate their toxicity profiles. The investigators' analysis will provide robust data as well as predictive factors regarding the outcome after SSRS.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Randomized Study Comparing Local Tumor Control After Post-Operative Single-Fraction or Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases#892664
- Single-fraction IMRT Versus External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Spine Bone Metastases#843252
- Study Comparing Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Brain Metastases#863326
- Image-guided and Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Versus External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Spine Metastases#859926
- Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases#1125404
Record · ID 870857
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive