PhilArchive
open access
Meditations on Beliefs Formed Arbitrarily
Had we grown up elsewhere or been educated differently, our view of the world would likely be radically different. What to make of this? This paper takes an accuracy-centered first-personal approach to the question of how to respond to the arbitrary nature in which many of our beliefs are formed. I show how considerations of accuracy motivate different responses to this sort of information depending on the type of attitude we take towards the belief in question upon subjecting the belief to doubt.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Disbelief is a distinct doxastic attitude#768754
- Resisting Pessimism Traps: The Limits of Believing in Oneself#755172
- How Knowing Works: A Structural Theory of Epistemic Appearance#117995
- The Problem of Culturally Normal Belief#767841
- ◉ The Managed Doubt Economy - Christian Doubt, Boundary Maintenance, and the Difference between Inquiry and Recommitment#730039
Record · ID 87179
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive