ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
compare the prone with the prone-flexed position accessibility of upper and middle calyceal approach by subcostal puncture and PCNL reporting complications using the Clavien-Dindo system with Categorisation of PCNL-specific complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification score
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy#1094873
- Assessment of the Effects of Access Count in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Renal Functions by Technetium-99M-Dimercaptosuccinic Acid Scintigraphy#994483
- Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS#826911
- Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Via the Extraperitoneal Approach in the Prone Position Versus the Lateral Position#1030802
- The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones#917483
Record · ID 872364
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive