Cisternostomy Vs Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

The objective of this clinical study is to compare the outcomes of two neurosurgical interventions, Cisternostomy and Decompressive Craniectomy (DC), for the management of severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Severe TBI presents challenges in managing intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion, often requiring surgical intervention. DC involves the removal of a section of the skull to reduce ICP, while Cisternostomy, a technique rooted in microsurgery, aims to alleviate brain edema and lower ICP by creating additional space for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation. This prospective study will be conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized into Group A (DC) and Group B (Cisternostomy) following brain CT scans. Clinical evaluation will include regular follow-ups for 6 months post-surgery, recording data on GOS, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU, and hospital stays. Analysis will be performed using SPSS 24, comparing outcomes between groups using Chi-square test and t-test. A significance level of p≤0.05 will be applied. It is hypothesized that Cisternostomy, as an adjunct to traditional TBI management, will effectively reduce ICP, resulting in improved GOS and reduced complications postoperatively, including decreased duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, with sustained improvement observed at 6 months