ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Complication Rate of Onlay vs Sublay Mesh Repair in Incisional Hernia
This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Eligible patients with incisional hernia were randomized into two parallel groups: sublay mesh repair and onlay mesh repair. Procedures were performed by a single experienced general surgeon. Postoperative complications were assessed by an independent surgeon blinded to the type of procedure. Patients were followed for a period of three months to evaluate safety and recurrence outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing#1029979
- Comparison of Sublay and Onlay Mesh Repair in Ventral Hernia#907837
- Open Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias#1075748
- Trial of Collagen Mesh for Prevention of Ventral Hernia After Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Cancer#850827
- Prophylactic Mesh Implantation for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia#1008907
Record · ID 872753
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive