ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Different Debonding Techniques of Clear Aligner Attachments
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different methods for removing clear aligner attachments from tooth surfaces and to evaluate the pain levels and removal times associated with each method. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Does the use of an adhesive removal plier result in less pain compared to using a tungsten carbide bur? * Is there a difference in the time required to remove attachments between the two methods? In this split-mouth, randomized clinical trial, participants who have completed clear aligner treatment will undergo two different attachment removal techniques: * Plier method: Attachments will be removed using adhesive removal pliers, followed by finishing with a tungsten carbide bur. * Bur method: Attachments will be removed entirely using a tungsten carbide bur. Pain levels will be assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) after each segment is treated, and the time required for each removal will be recorded. The amount of adhesive remaining on the enamel surface will also be evaluated. This study aims to determine which debonding technique provides a faster and more comfortable experience for patients at the end of aligner treatment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols#916175
- Treatment of Alveolar Osteitis: Traditional or Regenerative?#967042
- Alvogyl Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Healing of Alveolar Osteitis#806028
- Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach Versus Connective Tissue Graft#1073238
- Postoperative Pain Evaluation After Obturation With Different Sealers#878624
Record · ID 872855
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive