ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Quadriceps Sparing Versus Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty
This study is a randomized clinical trial comparing standard medial para-patellar total knee arthroplasty with a quadriceps sparing mid-vastus approach. Patients who are medically well and have a good support structure at home will be randomized to a standard or quadriceps sparing surgical approach stratified by type of analgesia (adductor canal block or local infiltration). We will compare patient satisfaction and costs from the perspective of the Ministry of Health, the institution, society and the patient.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Catheter and Intraarticular Catheter Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty#993017
- Adductor Canal Catheter vs Local Infiltration of Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty#896306
- Robotic Assisted vs Custom Made Total Knee Arthroplasty#1095903
- Comparison of Polyethylene Insert Variances of Different Total Knee Arthroplasty System in the Same Patients#856944
- Intra-Articular Catheter Total Knee Arthroplasty#910305
Record · ID 873875
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive