Expedited Versus Restrictive: Limitations on Activity Following Surgical Treatment of Prolapse

The objective of the EVeRLAST study is to determine whether expedited resumption of postoperative activity levels is non-inferior to standard activity restrictions with respect to short-term anatomic prolapse outcomes. We hypothesize that immediate resumption of physical activities as tolerated will result in noninferior surgical outcomes following prolapse surgery when compared to standard postoperative activity restrictions. Participants will be enrolled and randomized at their preoperative clinic visit to one of two treatment arms: Arm 1: Standard instructions (no heavy lifting over 10lbs for 6 weeks; return to work at 4 weeks for sedentary work and 6 weeks for manual labor) Arm 2: Liberal instructions (no restrictions; resume activities and work as soon as able) We will also collect subjective and objective measures of pre- and postoperative physical activity, through the use of patient-reported physical activity assessments and wrist-worn accelerometers. Accelerometer data will be collected at the preoperative, 2-week-postoperative, and 6-week-postoperative time points. Accelerometer data will also be used to calculate time to resumption of normal activities, defined as time at which a patient resumes greater than 90% of her baseline preoperative level of physical activity. We will additionally be collecting data on relevant patient-reported outcomes of pelvic floor symptom severity, health-related quality of life measures, postoperative pain, time to return to work (where relevant), and patient global impression of improvement. Postoperative anatomic assessments will be performed at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively by blinded study personnel