ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Post Extraction Changes After Ridge Preservation Using Allogeneic Dentin Matrix Vs Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft
the aim of this study is to establish if there are clinical, radio-graphical and histomorphometrical differences between using Allogenic Demineralized Dentin matrix versus Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) as a clinical application in alveolar bone regeneration procedures related to implant dentistry, including socket preservation, alveolar ridge augmentation, after tooth extraction in the esthetic zone.Will ridge preservation using Allogeneic Dentin Matrix be more effective than Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in managing the post extraction hard tissue alterations? The initial therapy consists of periodontal treatment (phase I therapy) including supragingival scaling, subgingival debridement if needed, adjustment of faulty restoration and polishing. The mechanical plaque control instructions for each patient include brushing and interdental cleaning techniques. alginate impression will be taken to fabricate an acrylic stent to be used as reference for measurements of width of ridge clinically. Flapless and atraumatic tooth extraction will be initiated, Then the socket will be filled either with Allogeneic Dentin Matrix or Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) up to the crestal level of then bone followed by placement of a collagen membrane to cover the socket. criss-cross horizontal mattress suturing technique Intervention group: The socket will be filled with Allogeneic Dentin Matrix Control group: The socket will be filled with Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). For both groups, All the subjects will be evaluated at pre-surgical, baseline and 6 months post surgical months for clinical parameters and baseline( immediate post-surgical and 6 months post-surgical . Outcomes: Change in ridge width clinically after 6 months, Change in the radiographic buccal vertical bone level, Change in the radiographic palatal vertical bone level,Change in the radiographic horizontal bone level,Percentage of new vital bone f
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques After Tooth Extraction#865544
- Soft Tissue Healing After Tooth Extraction#845113
- To Compare Ridge Preservation Technique Using Leukocyte Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) and Freeze-dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) Layered Technique vs L-PRF/FDBA and L-PRF Alone in Influencing Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets#1093939
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Following Tooth Extraction Using Bovine Xenograft With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane#870390
- Dimensional Changes in Alveolar Ridge Preservation#1163190
Record · ID 874573
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive