ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing the Effectiveness of mCIMT and Bimanual Training
This study aimed to compare the effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) and Bimanual Training (BIT) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, Children \&Youth (ICF-CY) conceptual framework. Our assumptions were that (1) mCIMT is more effective on outcomes representing all subdomains of ICF and (2) the possible improvements in the body structure and function, activity, and participation subdomains of ICF are intimately related to each other.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of m CIMT and Bilateral Arm Training on Upper Extremity Chronic Stroke Patients#904674
- Enhancing Participation of Chronic Stroke Patients by Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (HOMECIMT)#875408
- Effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Mirror Therapy in Hemiplegic Stroke#874176
- Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Plus Sensory Components After Stroke#992658
- Integrated, Practice-oriented Electromechanical-assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients#1126430
Record · ID 874575
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive