ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of 2 Ventilatory Support Strategies During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pneumonia
This retrospective monocentric study compares 2 ventilatory support strategies on outcomes (length of stay, intubation, mortality) in patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit with Covid-19 related pneumonia : invasive strategy used during the first period and non-invasive strategies (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, High Flow Nasal Canula, Prone Position) used during the second period.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Non-invasive Ventilatory Support of Patients Affected by COVID-19#1085261
- Effect of Prone Positioning in Patients With COVID-19#894208
- Robotic Assisted Early Mobilization in Ventilated ICU Patients With COVID-19#981870
- Lung Structure-Function In Survivors of Mild and Severe COVID-19 Infection#896448
- One-year Cardiac Follow-up of Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia#836912
Record · ID 874587
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive