PhilArchive
open access
Exploring Monosemy in Political Editorial Articles from a Student Publication Through Critical Discourse Analysis
The study of monosemy has gained scholarly attention for its role in enhancing precision and reducing ambiguity in political and editorial discourse. Student publications often address governance, education reforms, youth involvement, and community welfare, reflecting students’ critical engagement with societal issues. However, previous research on editorial language has primarily examined rhetorical strategies, with limited focus on the use of monosemy in student publications. This qualitative research, grounded in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), investigates the occurrence of English monosemy in political editorial articles written by students at Davao de Oro State College. A total of thirteen (13) articles, randomly collected from the Facebook pages of student publications between September 2022 and September 2024, served as the corpus for analysis. The study categorizes the types of monosemy employed, including contextual, diachronic, synchronic, functional, lexical, pragmatic, and semantic, and explores their communicative functions. Data were analyzed using CDA and validated through expert review. Findings reveal that student publications frequently employ monosemic terms, with semantic monosemy emerging as the most dominant type. The study also shows that monosemy fulfills multiple functions, with the ideational metafunction being the most prominent, followed by interpersonal and textual functions. Future research is encouraged to examine monosemy across diverse writing genres such as academic reports, business documents, and creative nonfiction. Exploring its contributions to clarity, precision, and efficiency in professional and literary communication would provide valuable insights. Moreover, adopting mixed method approaches, including linguistic analysis, surveys, and case studies, could further illuminate how monosemy enhances understanding across different fields. Its significance in legal, scientific, and instructional writing should also be investigated to refine specialized discourse, ensuring effective knowledge dissemination and interpretation across disciplines.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Imprecise lexical superiority and the (slightly less) Repugnant Conclusion#731428
- Gaskin, Richard. (ed.). The Question of Linguistic Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025, 336 pp. ISBN 9780192872654 rev. Azafea: revista de filosofía, Núm. 28, pp. 316-320#690715
- The Science of Meaning: Essays on the Metatheory of Natural Language Semantics#705856
- Chinese as a Master Signifier and the Becoming of Present Chinese: Symbolic Construction, Linguistic Compression, and Platform-Mediated Language Production#248490
- Kripke’s Wittgenstein: Meaning, Rules, and Scepticism#223390
Record · ID 87503
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive