ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Tranexamic Acid (TXA) Versus Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid (EACA) Versus Placebo for Spine Surgery
Tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) have been reported to reduce blood loss in the cardiac surgery literature but they have not been reported in use head-to-head in the orthopedic surgery literature. In a randomized, double-blind, prospective study we believe that TXA will be more effective than both EACA and placebo at reducing blood loss for corrective spinal surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Use of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) Intravenously, to Reduce Blood Loss in Proximal Femur Surgery#828380
- Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid Vs. Tranexamic Acid Vs. Placebo for Prevention of Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty#876808
- Tranexamic Acid and Head and Neck Surgery Patients#906747
- Comparison of Ciprofol-based and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Quality of Recovery#1101672
- Optimal Treatment for Spinal Cord Injury Associated With Cervical Canal Stenosis (OSCIS) Study#862817
Record · ID 875687
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive