ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Accuracy of Different Technologies for Dental Cast Digitization; CBCT Versus Desktop Optical 3D Scanner
The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of digital dental models generated from plaster casts by two different scanning techniques including Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and extraoral Scanner (EOS) . The comparison between the two techniques is assessed by orthodontic arch space analysis using linear measurements for arch length and width .
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Soft Tissue Volume, Dimensions and Tomographic Alveolar Ridge Classification System for Dental Implant Treatment.#886003
- Three-dimensional Assessment of Facial Alterations Induced by Dental Prostheses#813494
- Accuracy of Temporary Laminate Restorations With Digital Workflows#882295
- Cut-out-Rescan Procedure Under Rubber-Dam Isolation#878623
- Comparison of dental arch measurements between 3D-printed, digital, and stone casts.#9603
Record · ID 876393
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive