ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
TAP Block Versus Conventional Systemic Analgesia
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare TAP block to conventional systemic analgesia for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. As the adverse effects of pain management is related to size of opioid dose use, opioid consumption is chosen as the primary outcome and a decrease of at least 20% in the TAP block compared with the conventional systemic analgesia is considered to be clinically significant. Written informed consent has to obtained from all study patients. This trial is a prospective parallel group randomized superiority trial comparing TAP block to classic systemic analgesia in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery in the department of surgery, Mahmoud El Matri Hospital, Ariana, with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison Study of Transversus Abdominal Plane, Paravertebral and Epidural Blocks in Laparoscopic Colectomy#905065
- Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block to Reduce Post-operative Opioids#896082
- Comparison of Rescue Analgesia Requirement in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Transversus Abdominal Plane (tap) Block Vs Local Anesthetic Wound Infiltration At the End of Surgery#827866
- TAP Block With Lidocaine and Ropivacaine 0.2% (0.4 ml/kg/Side) for Pain and Opioid Reduction After Hysterectomy#843080
- Analgesic Efficacy of Parasternal Block Versus Parasternal Plus Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Coronary Bypass Surgery#895254
Record · ID 876635
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive